Objave

The problem with natives

Who is a native or indigenous person and since when and where, or on which territory, is becoming a global debate again. Indeed, throughout the history of mankind, we have had changing criteria for labeling a nation as native, as due to states of war and/or aggression, there has been mass migration and settlement across the entire global surface of planet Earth.  On European territory, we should at least know the almost disappeared Celts, although we have evidence of the division of European space already in the Stone Age, due to the massive Roman occupation and of course after the Roman occupation and their decline, there was a massive settlement of other peoples. However, the European space is not the only place where indigenous peoples could not actually survive on their territory and the great Roman Empire, which enslaved and exterminated many peoples on both sides of the Mediterranean, also disappeared.  We know the almost disappeared Mayan culture, the Aztec culture, and...

Problem z nativci

Kdo je nativec ali domorodec in od kdaj ter kje, oziroma na katerem teritoriju, postaja spet globalna debata. Res imamo skozi zgodovino človeštva spremenljive kriterije za oznako nekega naroda kot nativca, saj se je zaradi vojnih stanj in/ali agresij množično preseljevalo in naseljevalo po celotni svetovni površini planeta Zemlje.  Na evropskem teritoriju bi morali poznati vsaj skoraj izginule Kelte, čeprav imamo dokaze o podelitvi evropskega prostora že v kameni dobi,  zaradi množične rimske okupacije in seveda po rimski okupaciji in njihovem zatonu pa množično naseljevanje drugih ljudstev. Evropski prostor pa ni edini prostor, kjer pravzaprav domorodna ljudstva niso mogla obstati na svojem teritoriju in izginil je tudi veliki rimski imperij, ki je zasužnjil, pa tudi iztrebil veliko ljudstev na obeh straneh Sredozemlja. Poznamo skoraj izginulo majevsko kulturo, azteško kulturo, najverjetneje je skoraj vsem poznana tudi mogočna Perzija. Tudi Otomanski imperij se je zrušil...

Changes in human nature

Anyone who knows the history of human development also knows his primary primate nature and behavior. In principle, man is considered at the beginning of human history as a solitary animal-like creature who began to unite in groups for safety and to prey on larger animals. Thus began the first beginnings of man in society with its hierarchy, in which physical strength reigned first, and only then his skill and/or cunning. In the first periods of humanity, man did not deal much with the rules of society or social values and norms. Society was simply a pack in which the strongest ruled. This is how all the rules were set in this primary society. In layman's terms, everything began and ended with physical confrontations. The fight for females and territory and power ended in favor of the strongest.  The skill of governance and the skill of making primary weapons begins with the skill of working stone and wood and making simple dwellings, and a huge departure from other primates, who s...