Objave

International protection, migration, and population

  Following the Second World War, the Geneva Conventions began to take effect—both within the European Union and beyond—establishing standards for the treatment of prisoners of war (combatants) as well as non-combatants (civilians). The first Geneva Convention was signed as early as 1864, though by only 12 states. In contrast, the 1949 Geneva Conventions were signed by 63 governments. Today, there are 196 signatories to the Geneva Conventions. It is from these conventions that the concept of international protection (asylum) for individuals who do not receive protection in their country of citizenship or permanent residence (country of origin) has evolved. In the Republic of Slovenia, international protection encompasses both refugee status and subsidiary protection status. The same applies to other EU member states. Although not all countries worldwide implement international protection according to identical rules, migration—both authorized and unauthorized, including labor-relat...
Objavite komentar
Preberite več

Mednarodna zaščita in migracije ter populacije

  Po drugi svetovni vojni se je na področju Evropske unije in tudi izven, začela uveljavljati Ženevska konvencija, ki je začela določati ravnanje z vojnimi ujetniki-borci in tudi neborci-civilisti.  Prva Ženevska konvencija je bila podpisana že leta 1864, vendar jo je podpisalo le 12 držav. Ženevsko konvencijo iz leta 1949 pa je podpisalo kar 63 vlad. Dandanes pa štejemo med podpisnike Ženevske konvencije kar 196 držav. Prav iz te konvencije pa se je razvila tudi mednarodna zaščita  (azil) tistim posameznikom, ki zaščite niso deležni v državi njihovega državljanstva oziroma stalnega prebivališča (izvorne države). Mednarodna zaščita v Republiki Sloveniji pomeni status begunca in status subsidiarne zaščite. Podobno velja za ostale članice če EU.  Kljub temu, da vse  svetovne države države ne izvajajo po enakih pravil mednarodne zaščite, pa so dovoljene in nedovoljene migracije, vključno z delovnimi, v marsikateri državi spremenile strukturo domačega in tujega pre...
Objavite komentar
Preberite več

Discussions on family trauma

  Definitions of the family vary—at least, this is the position currently held by the academic field of sociology. A historical-sociological question has been raised: has there ever truly been a single, unified definition of the family, or have specific family forms been imposed historically and sociologically through the dominant social structure? A prime example is a long-standing family model consisting of grandparents (or the parents of one of the spouses), the married couple, and their children. Of course, other, often stigmatized figures—such as lovers or mistresses, along with the children born from these unions—were also frequently integrated into the family sphere. While these relationships were largely viewed as "sins," there is evidence suggesting that, in some cases, these lovers were valued more highly than the legitimate legal spouses. Marriage was, most often, a business arrangement—a union of two sets of assets and social statuses. Love—if love was present at ...
Objavite komentar
Preberite več