Politics and Expensiveness

 

The outlook or forecasts for this year are not the best again, as is often shown in everyday life. The political leaders of individual so-called developed countries have more than evidently forgotten that one of the conditions for successful business, which is also reflected in our daily survival basket, is actually a period of peace, not war.

A state of war or the threat of war brings additional burdens on citizens for defense purposes. A state of war itself means the destruction, not only of lives, but also of property and, of course, the disruption of business. And, of course, less money inflows into the state budget and greater state expenditures. Thus, the destructive and destructive nature of a state of war is projected into the destructive and destructive power of the economy and thus also our everyday lives.

War means a shortage of goods and thus also an increase in the cost of even basic necessities of life due to the destruction of factories and fields. War means expensive housing, since many or even most of them are damaged or destroyed. War also means a lack of peacetime jobs. War only means an increase in the number of jobs, if they are paid at all, in the life-threatening professions of the army and other support services. And of course, war, in addition to the multitude of lives lost, always produces a multitude of wounded, disabled and unprovided for children of deceased parents. War means, in short, a catastrophe for the economy, which in peacetime contributed to the state budget, and of course also catastrophically everyday life. In such a state, a person's goals are also reduced to bare survival.

The proximity of a state of war or a hotbed also always means a multitude of refugees who invade neighboring peaceful and calm countries without a state of war, in fact hungry and without any property. Also, these people who have been subjected to the horrors of war, in addition to basic necessities of life and accommodation and medical care, also need psycho-social assistance, not only integration or adaptation to a foreign culture and a foreign legal order.

Thus, we can conclude that the conflictual political culture of leading politicians of individual countries, which leads to the threat of war or a state of war, actually also leads to the destruction of the entire economy of these countries and, of course, consequently also to the destruction of the economies of neighboring peaceful countries that offer humanitarian aid and shelter to refugees.