No way without weapons

 Since February, the European Union (EU) has been "celebrating" three years of the so-called Russian-Ukrainian war on the outskirts of the EU, this time over the so-called Donetsk region, which some also call the Donetsk Republic. The war has not yet ended either diplomatically or with the use of weapons. Neither Bosnia and Herzegovina nor Kosovo have yet entered a period of peace. In the fall, we will also be able to "celebrate one year of another major attack on Israel on the other side of the Mediterranean, which was established after World War II.

We EU citizens are slowly getting used to the old and new needs for military force, as all diplomacy is powerless in the face of heated heads full of hatred and a war of death and destruction on the very outskirts of the peaceful EU.

Even the United Nations (UN), which was established after World War II, only powerlessly discusses the long-term sustainability of peace, coexistence and respect for declarations on human rights and the rights of the child. The European and world population is once again turning to religious, national and sexual hatred and spreading it across foreign territory and the so-called denacification, which means the erasure of certain nations. All in the name of one or another unitary and totalitarian ideologies that do not allow room for difference. Created rules for international peaceful relations and human dignity and respect for ethnic groups and nations and religious freedoms have thus begun to crumble and weaken precisely among the members who were supposed to maintain all these gains after World War II and sanction violators. The UN Security Council, which has Russia, the USA, China, France and Great Britain in its five-member permanent composition, is facing military operations and a state of war, which was first initiated by the UN Security Council member Russia. The USA followed suit by announcing the accession of Canada to the USA and, of course, the purchase of Greenland. It is also said that the eradication of Israel was planned. Thus, tendencies to use military force for the purpose of world domination have emerged precisely among the permanent members of the UN Security Council, which was supposed to ensure order and peace in the global sense since 1946 and prevent the outbreak of a new world war or a third world war.

The clear national borders created after the Second World War have become doubtful and are once again the subject of debates about the historical unification or disintegration of European or world nations and the common roots and dominance of larger nations. Pamphlets about the prosperity promised by great military powers are simply shattered by the ravages of military superiority and threats of the use of nuclear weapons.

Instead of developed diplomatic relations and peaceful resolution of international disputes, we are once again hearing that we will have to modernize militarily and invest more in the war industry, because only military superiority will save us from invasion and destruction. "Who will destroy whom" is once again the basic rule of world diplomacy and human relations.

Komentarji

Objavite komentar

Priljubljene objave iz tega spletnega dnevnika

Is BRICKS a threat to the West?

   The artificially created BRICKS currency has been around since 2006. Its function is designed and defined as an attempt to establish a universal currency for international business, which will help BRICKS members to be more secure against the so-called influence of the West. The first group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa was joined by the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia in all these years until October 2024. Saudi Arabia is also mentioned. The purpose of this year's meeting of BRICS members was also to increase the number of members, as more than 30 countries were expected to attend the meeting, and they tried to inspire them to accept BRICS in international trade by showing the growth of gross domestic product (GDP) or a measure of economic activity, or one of the indicators of the country's economic development. According to the BRICKS alliance, the G7 (USA, Canada, Japan, France, Italy, Great Britain and Germany) are facing tough times. T...
Preberite več

Which representatives would you vote for?

    We are once again in the time of resounding, glorious elections, when the people chose their representatives. Of course, the selection of people's representatives is always based on how well the candidates presented their programs to the wider masses. Of course, the selection of representatives is also based on what suits the broad masses of voters in these programs . Crowds of voters tend to like hearing stories and promises of their success, prosperity and peace. They are less willing to hear about other people's problems. This was also evident in this year's elections in the USA. A lot of people want to have their own interests and well-being in the first place in their country. Only after their needs are met would they deal with other problems and the well-being of others. Of course, this election story is also conditioned by the existing situation in the country. When a country lives in peace with other countries, it may think about ensuring peace for others as wel...
Preberite več

Politika in draginja

Obeti ali napovedi za letošnje leto spet niso najboljši kot se večkrat pokaže v vsakdanjem življenju. Politični  vrhovi posameznih tako imenovanih razvitih držav so več kot očitno pozabili, da je eden od pogojev za uspešno poslovanje, ki se odraža tudi v naši vsakodnevni košarici za preživetje, pravzaprav obdobje miru, ne pa vojne. Vojno stanje ali vojna nevarnost prinaša namreč dodatne obremenitve državljanov v obrambne namene. Samo vojno stanje pomeni uničevanje, ne samo življenj, ampak tudi premoženja in seveda tudi onemogočeno poslovanje. In seveda tudi manj pritoka denarja v državni proračun in večje državne izdatke. Tako se rušilna in uničevalna narava vojnega stanja projicira v rušilno in uničevalno moč gospodarstva in s tem tudi našega vsakdana. Vojna pomeni pomanjkanje dobrin in s tem tudi draginjo že osnovnih življenjskih potrebščin zaradi uničenja tovarn in polj. Vojna pomeni draga bivališča, saj jih je veliko ali celo večina poškodovanih ali uničenih. Vojna pomeni tudi ...
Preberite več