Who is the master of the house

 

People can never get used to the simple rules of interpersonal relationships, whether in the family, neighborhood, work or wider environment, even though the rules are quite simple. Maybe in our society we still have sexist promoters and attempts at domination without a legal basis or, simply put, we have people in society who operate outside the law or want to change it to their advantage.

The rules are quite clear and often, with regard to the master of the house, they simply refer to property rights. The owner of the house is quite simply also the master of the house or a person authorized by the owner of the house, regardless of gender, citizenship, race and education, etc. The owner and master of the house simply decides about his house or, in other words, disposes of his real estate, uses it or not and has all the rights to his real estate or house, as long as he does not endanger others with his actions. This is called the fundamental right of property protected by the Constitution and other laws, although in practice it often happens differently and we still encounter various attempts to encroach on fundamental property rights. As an example, let me cite provisions on the facade or roof, and not in a functional sense, such as that the roof tiles do not fall out of the roof and that passersby are not in danger. A roof tile that is not attached can make the owner liable for damages if someone is injured by your roof covering. It is similar with the facade, windows or doors. In short, a house with all those components of the house, which are of course supposed to stand next to a legal passage for others, can in this case also affect others if they are endangered or cause damage to them due to the components of the house.

Perhaps your choice of connections and method of heating, such as heating, which requires chimneys from which smoke can enter your houses or other residential units and of course into your respiratory tract and onto your skin, etc., is also a matter for others. So far, we have not yet seen a ban on heating with classic solid fuels such as wood for all those who do not have their own forest and live in settlements. Although we share a common atmosphere or air that is increasingly polluted. Also, this type of heating, not only with firewood or firewood or other wood products or residues, but also with pellets or briquettes or coal or oil, which consume oxygen during combustion and release carbon dioxide and other gases into the surroundings through the chimneys of individual residential buildings, has not yet received ecological treatment and solutions. Usually, a chimney on a house is not considered an air pollutant without its own filter that would reduce harmful emissions into the environment. The debate is very funny or not, when nowadays we hear about ecological guidelines on the so-called consumption of carbon-free energy, which applies mostly to companies and electricity producers.

Electricity with electric lines is already becoming a basic commodity and there are fewer and fewer complaints about networks of electric lines that also run across other lands to the owner's house. The same is true with the network of fiber optic cables that provide us with internet access and television signals.

A completely different example are municipal ordinances on the color of roof tiles or facades and windows and doors, which I myself understand the least. If individual ordinances determine the color and shape of house structures regardless of their function, which could be dangerous to others, this simply means that you have problems with observers of your house. Namely, if we walk past a house and do not observe it or, as the saying goes, "stare" at it, we do not care what color and, ultimately, the shape of a certain house is.

In short, the owner of the house should be limited in his property rights or in his right to "do whatever he wants" in his house and surroundings only in the case of encroaching on other property rights on land or houses or endangering others in terms of health as well as damage to other property objects.