Locked in boxes

 My constant complaint is slowly becoming that I am locked in the box of my profession and therefore limited in my free thinking. This limited thinking locked in the framework of the profession, or rather definitions, rules, laws and everything else learned through institutional education, which also means knowledge of a whole bunch of factual definitions, seems to have earned me the label of a fool who is prevented from innovative thinking. And I'm afraid I'm not the only one.

It's true, as I mentioned earlier, that through institutional education I had to demonstrate knowledge of a whole bunch of definitions. First of all, I had to know what I was talking about if I used words that otherwise have a broader descriptive meaning. Such a word began with the very concept of sociology and the areas that this discipline or science deals with. Without this knowledge, it is better to be silent in your studies or even better, to leave yourself before you are excluded by the educators or fail your studies.

When you master the professional definitions and rules of professional conduct in every study of any science or discipline and end up in the box of the profession, you can, of course, with empirical evidence, which means research and the like, afford innovation. This is how institutional education begins with seminars, laboratory exercises, final final works, all the way to independent research, where you can use your innovative imagination, which again must coincide with all behaviors in this field, so as not to simply run down the laboratory or otherwise harm people and the environment.

As a biologist, I cannot afford to want to make the grass purple and look for people to make the grass purple for me, except with artificial grass, which has no effect on the bion or our environment and of course is not real grass, because real grass contains prescribed components.

I cannot afford to experiment on people and give sociological inputs, because the professions prohibit us from experimenting on people and by such professional activities we also violate a whole series of laws. 

 The same applies to the biological field or the entire natural sciences. In fact, professional activity applies to all areas governed by so-called science. In other words, an engineer should never be run over by a machine. A doctor should never have a patient die. A professor should be able to perform a miracle even out of a fool. An electrician should never have an electrical installation fail.

The profession forbids us from even causing harm and imposes liability for harmful professional activity simply by virtue of the institutional certificate or education we have obtained. We immediately hear about abuse of the profession. We are also very familiar with negligent work or work contrary to the profession and our responsibility.

And so all professions continue to be locked in boxes of professional knowledge and responsibility, because the acquisition of education or profession itself has locked them in the box of professionally defined work in this field, which is based on knowledge of the definitions of the profession and/or already proven rules and/or definitions. However, a good question remains whether this really prevents professional workers or intellectuals from thinking innovatively, or whether it is simply a matter of public insults and an attempt to legalize unprofessional work.

Komentarji

Priljubljene objave iz tega spletnega dnevnika

Are fruits and vegetables medicine

Social sense

Which representatives would you vote for?