Problem z nativci

Kdo je nativec ali domorodec in od kdaj ter kje, oziroma na katerem teritoriju, postaja spet globalna debata. Res imamo skozi zgodovino človeštva spremenljive kriterije za oznako nekega naroda kot nativca, saj se je zaradi vojnih stanj in/ali agresij množično preseljevalo in naseljevalo po celotni svetovni površini planeta Zemlje. 

Na evropskem teritoriju bi morali poznati vsaj skoraj izginule Kelte, čeprav imamo dokaze o podelitvi evropskega prostora že v kameni dobi,  zaradi množične rimske okupacije in seveda po rimski okupaciji in njihovem zatonu pa množično naseljevanje drugih ljudstev. Evropski prostor pa ni edini prostor, kjer pravzaprav domorodna ljudstva niso mogla obstati na svojem teritoriju in izginil je tudi veliki rimski imperij, ki je zasužnjil, pa tudi iztrebil veliko ljudstev na obeh straneh Sredozemlja.

Poznamo skoraj izginulo majevsko kulturo, azteško kulturo, najverjetneje je skoraj vsem poznana tudi mogočna Perzija. Tudi Otomanski imperij se je zrušil in skrčil in še in še bi lahko naštevali ljudstva tudi iz Afrike, Amerike in Azije.

Na kratko povedano lahko rečemo, da so nativci ali domorodci izginjali na svojih ozemljih in naseljevali so se novi bodoči nativci ali domorodci skozi vso zgodovino človeštva.

Epilog takšnih množičnih naseljevanj ali okupacij tujih teritorij ter iztrebljanju nativcev in domorodcev naj bi bil postavljen vsaj po bridki izkušnji genocidov ne samo nad Židi, ampak nad številnimi narodi,  po 2. svetovni vojni. Zmagovalci 2. svetovne vojne so  ustanovili Organizacijo združenih narodov (OZN), skupaj z Varnostnim svetom, ki naj bi preprečil nadaljnje izginjanje domorodnih ali nativnih ljudstev. Prav v OZN grbu najdemo tudi zemljevid z vsemi sedanjimi vrisanimi državnimi mejami med posameznimi sedaj domorodnimi ali nativnimi narodi, ki naj bi bili po holokavstu okronani tudi s svojo lastno suverenostjo. 

Po nekaterih  podatkih naj bi ostalo na planetu Zemlja samo še 6 % staroselskih ljudstev od celotne človeške populacije. Po OZN podatkih obstajata samo dve staroselskih državi, kjer je večina populacije še staroselska in sicer sta to Grenlandija in Bolivija. V Gvatemali pa je potomcev staroselskih Majev samo še 45 %. Vse ostale države se pravzaprav štejejo kot moderne države in ne kot staroselske. 

Organizacija združenih narodov (OZN) ima trenutno 193 držav članic in 2 državi opazovalki (Sedež OZN). Status opazovalca imata trenutno Sveti sedež (Vatikan) in Palestina. Seveda to ne pomeni, da so te države tudi nativne ali domorodne, čeprav imajo vpisano večinsko prebivalstvo posamezne države, ki pravzaprav uveljavljajo svojo celotno kulturo z jezikom vred  kot narodno kulturo na svojem teritoriju in jo ponavadi tudi ščitijo ali pa zahtevajo zaščito.

Sprijazniti se moramo, da po številnih genocidih skozi zgodovino človeštva, ni več kaj dosti staroselcev. Nastajala pa so nova ljudstva in narodi s svojimi ozemlji, ki si prizadevajo za status nativca ali domorodca na njihovem teritoriju. Sedanja moderna konfiguracija države in naroda v smislu v Izraelu so Izraelci, v Nemčiji so Nemci, v Rusiji so Rusi in tako naprej po celotnem svetovnem zemljevidu, se ruši pod kompleksnostjo vprašanja množičnih migracij iz takšnih ali drugačnih razlogov in antagonizmi zahtevane integracije sedanjih narodov in ljudstev na njihovem teritoriju in pravicami priseljencev, ki bi radi prakticirali svojo kulturo v drugi ali tuji sedanji moderni državi, ki  so že nekako  ustoličene tudi na zemljevidu OZN.



Komentarji

Objavite komentar

Priljubljene objave iz tega spletnega dnevnika

Social sense

  People still like to rely on our hearts, or on the aroused heartfelt and kind-hearted or charitable feelings that are projected to us by the confessed hardships of others, the threat and exposure to violence of false and real victims. The heart is guided by the image or promotion of the victims or their confessions and stories, which can be true or imaginary. Our social-compassionate reactions, however, depend on the well-presented story of the alleged victims. The paradox of the well-presented story of the victim and the reality of real life goes so far in everyday life that we actually recognize starvation even in very well-nourished people or even in obese people, who are such without any disease that would cause bloating or obesity. On the other hand, we recognize a starving or, in colloquial terms, a thin person as someone who is deliberately losing weight, wants to have a model figure, or  some other way causes their own underweight. It is difficult to leave it to doc...
Preberite več

Clothes make the man

  Our modern perception of modern society is based on the ideas of personal freedom and empathy for others. Above all, we have the idea that our society is based on tolerance for difference. Such ideas about our society are strongly contradictory to the principle of society that a person is judged according to the style or lack of style of clothing and that the old saying appears in society again: "The clothes make the man." We have known about crime in ties or white-collar crime for a very long time in the history of mankind. We have certainly known about crime in the highest strata of society for as long as the crime of poverty or crime in the lowest strata and also about difference. But we certainly encounter crime or criminals in one way or another in clothes. At least we should know about it. The principle of putting on clothes and killing people and stealing and breaking and violating others' fundamental human rights and freedoms should be unacceptable, just like th...
Preberite več

Which representatives would you vote for?

    We are once again in the time of resounding, glorious elections, when the people chose their representatives. Of course, the selection of people's representatives is always based on how well the candidates presented their programs to the wider masses. Of course, the selection of representatives is also based on what suits the broad masses of voters in these programs . Crowds of voters tend to like hearing stories and promises of their success, prosperity and peace. They are less willing to hear about other people's problems. This was also evident in this year's elections in the USA. A lot of people want to have their own interests and well-being in the first place in their country. Only after their needs are met would they deal with other problems and the well-being of others. Of course, this election story is also conditioned by the existing situation in the country. When a country lives in peace with other countries, it may think about ensuring peace for others as wel...
Preberite več