VsakodnevnoByDarja

  Opinions are always divided when Slovenian politicians say that we are the country with the highest tolerance for illegal migration, even though we are not the first Schengen border crossing. The promised European less tolerant policy guideline and the guideline for a paradise for illegal migration cannot be reconciled. Illegal migration to the European Union (EU) via the Balkan route is increasing. According to Frontex data, the number of illegal entries into the EU is decreasing, but Slovenia's illegal migration situation is an exception, and so is the Balkan route to the EU. Forgotten rules for "hardworking" registered citizens and the equalization with migration Only a Slovenian citizen within the territory of Slovenia must have a valid document, otherwise the police can fine you 200 euros. Crossing the state border without the appropriate documents costs you from 200 to 500 euros. Crossing the border outside border crossings costs you a minimum of 400 euros. Ident...

  Ob izjavah slovenskih politikov, da smo država, ki ima največjo toleranco do ilegalnih migracij, čeprav nismo prva schengenski mejni prehod, se mnenja vedno krešejo. Obljubljena evropska manj tolerantna smernica politike in smernica raja za ilegalne migracije, se nikakor ne moreta uskladiti. Ilegalne migracije v Evropsko unijo (EU) po Balkanski poti pa naraščajo. Po podatkih na Frontex pa se število ilegalnih vstopov v EU zmanjšuje, ampak slovensko ilegalno migracijski stanje je pač izjema in se tem izgleda tudi balkanska pot v EU. Pozabljena pravila za "pridne" registrirane državljane in izenačitev z migracijami Samo za slovenskega državljana znotraj teritorija Slovenije velja, da mora imeti pri sebi veljaven dokument, drugače vas policija lahko oglobi za 200 evrov. Prestop državne meje brez ustreznih dokumentov pa vas stane od 200 do 500 evrov. Prestop meje izven mejnih prehodov vas stane minimalno 400 evrov. Zloraba identitete s ponarejanjem osebnih listin vas pa lahko s...

  Today, we may or may not be amused, as some may judge, by the collapse of the global economy, which knew no blocs, national borders, or political systems. I think we have known the name and organization of multinational or international economic groups or companies or capital for quite some time. The economy has expanded beyond international borders and political systems and grown into global international groups, where the main guideline is the amount of capital. Of course, the economy has also grown into the political and information sphere. We have slowly put everything together under the name of globalization. Globalization has become a process that is supposed to include faster economic development, greater choice for consumers, and easier mutual cooperation on a global scale. Among the challenges and negative consequences, the loss of local cultural specificities, the widening gap between rich and poor, the exploitation of labor in less developed countries, and global envir...

 Dandanes se lahko  pozabavamo ali pa tudi ne, kakor pač kdo ocenjuje, s sesutjem globalne ekonomije, ki ni poznala blokov, državnih meja in političnih sistemov. Mislim, da  že kar dolgo poznamo naziv in organizacijo multinacionalnih ali mednarodnih ekonomskih združb ali podjetij ali kapitala. Ekonomija   ali gospodarstvo   se je razširilo preko mednarodnih meja in političnih sistemov in prerasla v globalne mednarodne združbe, kjer je glavno vodilo količina kapitala. Seveda je gospodarstvo zraslo tudi v politično in informacijsko sfero. Počasi smo vse skupaj pospravili kar pod naziv globalizacija. Globalizacija je postala proces, ki naj bi  vključeval hitrejši gospodarski razvoj, večjo izbiro za potrošnike in lažje medsebojno sodelovanje v svetovnem merilu. Med izzivi in negativnimi posledicami pa pogosto omenjajo izgubo lokalnih kulturnih posebnosti, večanje razlik med bogatimi in revnimi, izkoriščanje delovne sile v manj razvitih državah ter globalne okol...

  We are well aware that no one really makes the weather and we cannot blame anyone for the increasingly frequent storms that threaten our homes. At least hypothetically, no one causes strong winds, nor abnormal amounts of precipitation, which hypothetically consequently cause landslides and  rivers had raisen. Of course, we have experts who take care of rivers. We also have experts who take care of wastewater. And of course we also have bills and/or fees. Clogged drains and swollen rivers that cause floods and of course roads with rivers, streams and torrents rolling over them, and slippery slopes, according to some opinions, should not exist. Nor should we hear that someone had to move the construction of a house towards the now slippery slope in order to obtain a location and building permit.   Slovenia's flood lesson happened recently, namely in August 2023, when two-thirds of Slovenia's territory was affected. And this happened just a year after a catastrophic f...

  Dobro se zavedamo, da res vreme nihče ne dela in ne moremo nikogar obdolžiti za čedalje pogostejša neurja, ki nam ogrožajo naše domove. Vsaj hipotetično nihče ne povzroča močnega vetra, tudi ne abnormalne količine padavin, ki hipotetično posledično povzročajo še plazove in narasle reke. Imamo pa seveda strokovnjake, ki skrbijo za reke. Prav tako imamo strokovnjake, ki poskrbijo za odpadne vode. In seveda imamo tudi položnice in/ali dajatve. Zamašeni odtoki in narasle reke, ki povzročajo poplave in seveda ceste po katerih se valijo reke, potoki in hudourniki ter drseča pobočja tako po nekaterih mnenjih ne bi smela obstajati. Prav tako pa tudi ne bi smeli slišati, da je nekdo moral prestaviti gradnjo hiše proti sedaj drsečemu pobočju, da je lahko pridobil lokacijsko in gradbeno dovoljenje.  Slovenska poplavna  lekcija se je zgodila nedavno in sicer avgusta leta 2023, ko je bila prizadeta dve tretjini slovenskega ozemlja. In to se je zgodilo samo leto dni po katastrofalnem...

  Where is the clear line and clear rules of interpersonal relations is a new paradigm of public debate in several areas, including parliament and the rules of parliamentary conduct. In the Slovenian parliament, people are said to behave like vagabonds, and thus a debate is being raised about whether the government is like its people, or whether people behave like those in power. What is vagabond and what is streetwise has also become a matter of current debate. Streetwise people are vagrants, vagrants, and most likely also homeless people, and perhaps even those who do not have their own offices or shops and most likely do not have them registered, but work and/or live right on the street. In short, the first example of streetwise behavior, which is also said to be inappropriate for our social norms and values, but is present, certainly does not apply to our parliament, since our parliament is registered with its seat at the address. In parliament, deputies are also supposed to de...

Kje je jasna črta in jasna pravila medosebnih odnosov je nova paradigma javne debate na večih področjih, vključno z parlamentom in pravili parlamentarnega obnašanja. V slovenskem parlamentu naj bi se namreč pocestniško obnašali in se tako poraja debata ali je vlada podobna svojim ljudem, ali pa se ljudje ravnajo po vladajočih. Kaj je pocestniško in pocestno je tudi postala stvar aktualne debate. Pocestni so klateži, potepuhi in najverjetneje tudi brezdomci in mogoče celo tisti, ki nimajo svojih pisarn ali trgovin in najverjetneje jih tudi nimajo registriranih, pa delujejo in/ali stanujejo kar na cesti. Skratka prvi primer pocestnega ravnanja, ki naj bi bilo našim družbenim normam in vrednotam tudi neprimerno, je pa prisotno,  vsekakor ne velja za naš parlament, saj imamo parlament registriran s sedežem na naslovu. V parlamentu naj bi poslanci in poslanke tudi parlamentarno razpravljali in sprejemali zakone, ki nam regulirajo medosebne odnose in določajo, predpisi kaj je zakoni...

  We very often encounter modern terminology and very often recall such descriptions from the past. One such example is mobbing, which modern terminology refers to bullying in the workplace. In order for mobbing to be legally defined as mobbing, it must be carried out at least once a week and for a longer period of six months. Mobbing is the modern definition of psychological terror of a superior over subordinates, which was called bossing. However, we do not know of a society, not even a socialist one, where there would be no boss and subordinates. Among them are working relationships and relationships where you can actually keep quiet about your boss, because the boss is always right. Those who teach you to "talk the boss down" can bring you at least to the brink of professional and work collapse, if not over the edge into the abyss. A new form is also said to be horizontal mobbing, although it reminds me of a very old form of competition for a higher position or higher sal...

  Zelo pogosto srečamo moderno terminologijo in zelo pogosto se spomnimo takšnih opisov že iz preteklosti. Takšen primer je tudi mobing, ki ga navezuje sodobna terminologija na trpinčenje na delovnem mestu. Mobing, da ga lahko zakonsko op redelimo kot mobing, se mora izvajati vsaj enkrat na teden in daljše obdobje šestih mesecev. Kot mobing je novodobno opredeljen  psihični teror nadrejenega nad podrejenimi, kar so poimenovali bossing.  Ne poznamo pa družbe, tudi socialistične ne, kjer ne bi bilo šefa in podrejenih. Med njimi pa delovnih razmerij in odnosov, ko si pravzaprav lahko šefu tiho, saj ima šef vedno prav. Tisti, ki učijo, da šefu "soli pamet", vas lahko pripeljejo vsaj do roba poklicnega in delovnega propada, če ne čez rob v brezno. Nova oblika naj bi bil tudi horizontalni mobing, čeprav mene spominja za zelo staro obliko tekmovanja za višje delovno mesto ali višjo plačo in boljše pogoje dela. Pri tem pa se je  seveda uporabljalo tudi vedno šikaniranje. Sta...

Who is a native or indigenous person and since when and where, or on which territory, is becoming a global debate again. Indeed, throughout the history of mankind, we have had changing criteria for labeling a nation as native, as due to states of war and/or aggression, there has been mass migration and settlement across the entire global surface of planet Earth.  On European territory, we should at least know the almost disappeared Celts, although we have evidence of the division of European space already in the Stone Age, due to the massive Roman occupation and of course after the Roman occupation and their decline, there was a massive settlement of other peoples. However, the European space is not the only place where indigenous peoples could not actually survive on their territory and the great Roman Empire, which enslaved and exterminated many peoples on both sides of the Mediterranean, also disappeared.  We know the almost disappeared Mayan culture, the Aztec culture, and...

Kdo je nativec ali domorodec in od kdaj ter kje, oziroma na katerem teritoriju, postaja spet globalna debata. Res imamo skozi zgodovino človeštva spremenljive kriterije za oznako nekega naroda kot nativca, saj se je zaradi vojnih stanj in/ali agresij množično preseljevalo in naseljevalo po celotni svetovni površini planeta Zemlje.  Na evropskem teritoriju bi morali poznati vsaj skoraj izginule Kelte, čeprav imamo dokaze o podelitvi evropskega prostora že v kameni dobi,  zaradi množične rimske okupacije in seveda po rimski okupaciji in njihovem zatonu pa množično naseljevanje drugih ljudstev. Evropski prostor pa ni edini prostor, kjer pravzaprav domorodna ljudstva niso mogla obstati na svojem teritoriju in izginil je tudi veliki rimski imperij, ki je zasužnjil, pa tudi iztrebil veliko ljudstev na obeh straneh Sredozemlja. Poznamo skoraj izginulo majevsko kulturo, azteško kulturo, najverjetneje je skoraj vsem poznana tudi mogočna Perzija. Tudi Otomanski imperij se je zrušil...

Anyone who knows the history of human development also knows his primary primate nature and behavior. In principle, man is considered at the beginning of human history as a solitary animal-like creature who began to unite in groups for safety and to prey on larger animals. Thus began the first beginnings of man in society with its hierarchy, in which physical strength reigned first, and only then his skill and/or cunning. In the first periods of humanity, man did not deal much with the rules of society or social values and norms. Society was simply a pack in which the strongest ruled. This is how all the rules were set in this primary society. In layman's terms, everything began and ended with physical confrontations. The fight for females and territory and power ended in favor of the strongest.  The skill of governance and the skill of making primary weapons begins with the skill of working stone and wood and making simple dwellings, and a huge departure from other primates, who s...

Kdor pozna zgodovino razvoja človeka, pozna tudi njegovo primarno primatsko naravo in vedenje. Načeloma se obravnava človeka na začetku zgodovine človeštva  kot samotarsko živalim podobno bitje, ki se je začelo združevati v skupine zaradi varnosti in zaradi plenjenja večjih živali. Tako so se začeli prvi začetki človeka v družbi z njeno hierarhijo, v kateri je vladala na prvem mestu fizična moč, šele nato pa njegova spretnost in/ali zvitost. V prvih obdobjih človeštva se človek s pravili družbe ali družbenimi vrednotami in normami ni kaj dosti ukvarjal. Družba je bila pač trop v katerem je vladal najmočnejši. Tako so se postavljala vsa pravila v tej primarni družbi. Po domače povedano se je vse začelo in končalo s fizičnimi obračuni. Boj za samice in teritorij ter oblast se je končal v prid najmočnejšemu. Spretnost vladanja in spretnost izdelave primarnega orožja se začne s spretnostjo obdelave kamna in lesa ter izdelave preprostih bivališč ter velikanskim odmikom od drugih primato...

  Human capital is said to be becoming of secondary importance, as cybernetics and/or robotics and/or drones and/or artificial intelligence come to the fore, which were presented as the creation of humanity that will make everyday life easier for humanity. Increasingly, however, this kind of creation of humanity is being turned into an attempt to dominate individual nations and, to put it bluntly, for military purposes. Thus, a reasonable question arises whether nations that bet on robotics and artificial intelligence and at the same time also bet on massive human capital will rule over those that still perhaps only bet on massive human capital and/or lag behind in cybernetics, robotics and artificial intelligence. If the robot army was science fiction in the past, today it is becoming a reality. And of course, alongside the robot army, as well as other uses of robots, the meaningfulness of the mass of humanity is put side by side, although in fact all robotics is the creation of ...

  Človeški kapital naj bi postajal sekundarno pomemben, saj na prvo mesto prihaja kibernetika in/ali robotika in/ali droni in/ali umetna inteligenca, ki so bili predstavljeni kot tista stvaritev človeštva, ki bo človeštvu lajšala vsakdanje življenje. Čedalje pogosteje pa se tovrstna stvaritev človeštva sprevrača v poskus nadvlade nad posameznimi narodi in kar direktno povedano v vojaške namene. Tako se poraja umestno vprašanje ali ne bodo vladali ravno narodi, ki stavijo na robotiko in umetno inteligenco in hkrati tudi stavijo na množičen človeški kapital nad tistimi, ki še stavijo mogoče samo na množični človeški kapital in/ali  zaostajajo v kibernetiki, robotiki in umetni inteligenci. Če je bila robotska vojska v preteklosti znanstvena fantastika, dandanes postaja realnost. In seveda se ob robotski vojski, pa tudi ostalih uporabah robotov, ob bok postavlja smiselnost množičnosti človeštva, čeprav je pravzaprav vsa robotika stvaritev majhnega dela človeštva, ki poskuša nadome...

  People, at least it seems, have become accustomed to transparency and, above all, clarity regarding our everyday life circumstances. We want to know clearly which country we live in, what the state structure is, who the leaders are and also which organizations we are members of and what this means for us. However, these clear parameters of our lives are slowly becoming blurred and confusion is also creating in our heads. Most of the countries of the European Union are in the military-defense pact we call NATO. They are supposed to be threatened at our external borders and they are supposed to feel safe within the military-defense pact. This is confirmed by the very picture or map of NATO members.  And we certainly find the now current Greenland and the formerly current Canada on the map of NATO members. As such, they are also supposed to be safe members, as they are supposed to be protected by Article 5 of the treaty, which is supposed to guarantee the slogan: "...