VsakodnevnoByDarja

  Human capital is said to be becoming of secondary importance, as cybernetics and/or robotics and/or drones and/or artificial intelligence come to the fore, which were presented as the creation of humanity that will make everyday life easier for humanity. Increasingly, however, this kind of creation of humanity is being turned into an attempt to dominate individual nations and, to put it bluntly, for military purposes. Thus, a reasonable question arises whether nations that bet on robotics and artificial intelligence and at the same time also bet on massive human capital will rule over those that still perhaps only bet on massive human capital and/or lag behind in cybernetics, robotics and artificial intelligence. If the robot army was science fiction in the past, today it is becoming a reality. And of course, alongside the robot army, as well as other uses of robots, the meaningfulness of the mass of humanity is put side by side, although in fact all robotics is the creation of ...

  Človeški kapital naj bi postajal sekundarno pomemben, saj na prvo mesto prihaja kibernetika in/ali robotika in/ali droni in/ali umetna inteligenca, ki so bili predstavljeni kot tista stvaritev človeštva, ki bo človeštvu lajšala vsakdanje življenje. Čedalje pogosteje pa se tovrstna stvaritev človeštva sprevrača v poskus nadvlade nad posameznimi narodi in kar direktno povedano v vojaške namene. Tako se poraja umestno vprašanje ali ne bodo vladali ravno narodi, ki stavijo na robotiko in umetno inteligenco in hkrati tudi stavijo na množičen človeški kapital nad tistimi, ki še stavijo mogoče samo na množični človeški kapital in/ali  zaostajajo v kibernetiki, robotiki in umetni inteligenci. Če je bila robotska vojska v preteklosti znanstvena fantastika, dandanes postaja realnost. In seveda se ob robotski vojski, pa tudi ostalih uporabah robotov, ob bok postavlja smiselnost množičnosti človeštva, čeprav je pravzaprav vsa robotika stvaritev majhnega dela človeštva, ki poskuša nadome...

  People, at least it seems, have become accustomed to transparency and, above all, clarity regarding our everyday life circumstances. We want to know clearly which country we live in, what the state structure is, who the leaders are and also which organizations we are members of and what this means for us. However, these clear parameters of our lives are slowly becoming blurred and confusion is also creating in our heads. Most of the countries of the European Union are in the military-defense pact we call NATO. They are supposed to be threatened at our external borders and they are supposed to feel safe within the military-defense pact. This is confirmed by the very picture or map of NATO members.  And we certainly find the now current Greenland and the formerly current Canada on the map of NATO members. As such, they are also supposed to be safe members, as they are supposed to be protected by Article 5 of the treaty, which is supposed to guarantee the slogan: "...