Social perception of work and non-work

  The world is once again subject to debates about the social perception of the lazy and unemployed. Some complain about social transfers, others would worry about world hunger and migration to the country. Still others feel sorry for migrants or the poor in another country.

The most vocal are currently those who oppose social transfers that belong to people of working age. There are slightly fewer of those who offer jobs and who turn to Employment Services and other employment agencies to help them find suitable workers. Very often, there are also statements in the public that employers cannot fill vacancies or obtain an adequate workforce.

Still others would assign unemployed people to public works without payment for work. Such actions would most likely also cause an additional shortage of jobs in state structures and debates about exploiting the shortage of jobs and in this way also obtaining free labor or simply further exploiting the shortage of jobs. Some, of course, are already comparing such a system to work centers or camps from the past.

Even on-the-job training, which does not bring any payment for work, but you can only obtain increased social assistance depending on the activity, is controversial for many. The need for on-the-job training can mean questionable training for work through the education system and, of course, nullify the acquired professional education, which is supposed to be intended for adequate qualifications for work in individual fields. There is also a lack of tracking the number of on-the-job trainings and subsequent employment with this employer, or the success of this program for reducing unemployment. This also applies to the fact that each employer focuses on the specificity of its business and thus the complexity of its jobs.

There are also findings that some employers simply exploit state subsidies to employ older and younger workers from year to year. Similar statements also appear for existing public works, which are not always equivalent to regular employment.

 Paid employment is becoming a rare commodity. Finding a job is the responsibility of the individual. With all the employment services, it is difficult to find referrals for job interviews. And it is very rare to find a statement that individual employment services are unable to provide workers to companies. This also gives rise to the conclusion that anyone who pays for work fairly has never had problems with labor or human capital.

The lack of low-educated workers is a mere fantasy. In the entire European Union, the highest number of unemployed people are precisely those with a low educational level. In fact, the unemployment rate decreases with a higher level of education, at least according to official data. Of course, we must also take into account the fact that the share of those who achieve higher education is smaller. There are fewer and fewer people who complete higher levels of education, since the level of education achieved in a certain generation resembles a triangle.

The fantasy of slackers, which appears on social networks and in government circles, is also insufficiently proven. Proof of laziness is very easily feasible through referrals to vacant jobs and refusals of paid work based on the adequacy of education. However, these numbers are very rare and few. So the populist rhetoric that able-bodied people should be in jobs and not on social assistance remains, including insults to workers who cannot secure employment and the spending of state money on various employment subsidies.

Komentarji

Priljubljene objave iz tega spletnega dnevnika

Social sense

Are fruits and vegetables medicine

Ljubica je lahko zaposlena, žena ne